• cover image with the title of the article and a photo of a woman

7 Reasons why to independently optimize campaigns in Google and Microsoft Ads

Google and Microsoft Ads are two significant advertising platforms in the pay-per-click (PPC) advertising realm, each with its unique features and audience. While it may be tempting to apply a universal strategy to both platforms, it is essential to realize that separate optimization of campaigns for Google and Microsoft Ads is necessary for maximizing the performance of product campaigns.

The need for separate optimization arises from several reasons. Google, as the most widely used search engine in the world, offers a vast amount of data and a wide demographic diversity, enabling precise targeting and detailed segmentation. Microsoft with Bing search, although having a smaller reach, provides unique targeting opportunities and integration with products like LinkedIn, which is particularly valuable for B2B marketing.

These differences in demographics, competition, AI, data sets, and unique features require tailored strategies and tactics for each platform to make advertising campaigns as effective as possible.

In the following 7 points, we will explore the main differences between Google and Microsoft Ads and provide an overview of why it is crucial to approach the optimization of PPC campaigns on these two platforms separately, to maximize returns on investment in online advertising.

1. Different Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Google and Bing use different AI technologies. In our experience, Google usually achieves better results in identifying potential customers. However, this experience may not be universally applicable, and performance differences could also be due to other factors.

The efficiency of AI on each platform should be regularly evaluated, and campaigns should be adjusted according to the latest trends and improvements in AI.

2. Different Demographics

Although both search engines are popular among various groups of people, there are clear differences between them. Bing users tend to be younger and have higher household incomes, while Google is much more frequently used as a search engine. Google achieves higher overall traffic, meaning a broader audience to target. These demographic characteristics should influence your approach to campaign targeting.

3. Different Competition

In both advertising systems, pay-per-click works on an auction basis. The bidding strategies in product campaigns are also similar.

You’ll find different competitors on Google Search and Bing. With Bing, as a smaller search engine, you can achieve better results and lower costs per click (CPC) due to weaker competition. It’s important to analyze the competitive environment on each platform to allocate and adjust budgets effectively.

4. Different integration with other services and platforms

Google and Bing differ in how they integrate their advertising platforms with other services and applications. Google, with its wide range of services like Google Shopping, YouTube, and Google Analytics, offers extensive options for cross-platform marketing strategies.

Bing, as part of the Microsoft ecosystem, provides unique integrations with products like Office 365, LinkedIn, and even Xbox.

These integrations open up opportunities for targeting and retargeting based on user interactions with various products and services. Utilizing these integrations can create a stronger and more precise marketing strategy.

5. Different Data

Effective machine learning requires large data sets. Google is undeniably a leader in data collection. In addition to the Google search engine, their data sources include YouTube, Google Maps, Google Photos, the Chrome browser, Android, Gmail, and others. This massive data repository allows Google to provide more precise and targeted advertising options. Therefore, it’s important to understand and utilize these differences in performance and targeting accuracy.

6. Different Features

Bing and Google, although having many similar fundamental features, also offer several unique functions that deserve special attention when optimizing PPC campaigns.

Bing, as part of Microsoft, allows the use of LinkedIn data for targeting based on company or job position, which is extremely useful for B2B marketing.

On the other hand, Google Ads offers advanced targeting and audience segmentation options, thanks to the vast amount of user data Google has collected. This includes sophisticated use of demographic data, interests, and user behavior on the web.

7. Different User Interface (UI)

Regarding the user interface and campaign management options, Google and Microsoft Ads differ. This has a significant impact on the management and optimization of campaigns.

The interface of Google Ads is more modern and user-friendly, while the Microsoft Ads interface appears less modern. However, it is expected that the interface of both systems will evolve and improve to be more user-friendly.

Conclusion and Summary

Each point emphasizes that successful utilization of Google and Microsoft Ads requires different approaches and strategies. It is important to test and continuously adapt campaigns on each platform to achieve the best possible results.

For this purpose, to ensure the best performance of campaigns in Google and Microsoft Ads, we have prepared the option to create separate campaigns for these advertising systems.

In the PPC tool BlueWinston, you can easily create product campaigns (Performance Max, Product Text Campaigns, DSA) for Google and Microsoft Ads. Subsequently, you can manage and optimize these campaigns separately to achieve the best results.

Get your product advertising done with BlueWinston

Every single solution and feature is excellent, but all together bring you a powerful product advertising platform for achieving great results and huge time ㅤㅤ& cost savings!

Go to homepage

About the Author:

Account manager at BlueWinston & CCS Shopping in EU (I'm the guy responsible for the most effective PPC tool to create product text and Smart Shopping campaigns for Google Search)